Once again the press has a feeding frenzy over the sex lives of the filthy rich and powerful. It's amazing is how seemingly sophisticated adults can get worked up about a wealthy politician, and freedoms. Is not that rich and powerful largely over boldly go where ordinary people can not enter. But secretly ... We are not dreaming.
So why this litany of moral indignation? Are we really so shocked and horrified? - Or, as Jon Lovitz might say, "Just Acting". Sure - we should know byNow that politicians regularly lie and cheat. They call it an occupational hazard.
"Ethics and responsibility are, and remain strictly in my administration," and that "I've always said that I want ethics and integrity is the hallmark of my administration."
This quote is rather hypocritical Spitzer climax, but really - it is an event of this magnitude, that it should dominate the news? Must we tell women suffer through endless interviews.Do we need these devout practitioners (all thieves explain their latest book), why men cheat?
This author finds it a little naive, hypocritical and too surreal to hear the incessant ranting on about Eliot Spitzer. He is just the "bad boy of the hour". As long as there are rich and powerful men, they will find a way to do what they want.
Of course, it is surprising that Bill Clinton a Rhodes Scholar and one Eliot Spitzer Princeton / Harvard grad is not a bit more clever. Eliotscored a perfect last will and generally as a man with a burning spirit considered. I assume there is no real correlation between social IQ and school performance. Someone please write an etiquette for the public service. Now, should one million seller.
What happened to the concierge service for the wealthy? For a hefty fee to everything from personal assistants, the best Armagnac. Why not a page from the book its English counterpart is the rent andTo manage their own personal Jeeves - personal affairs? A talented, resourceful valet rescue of these bad boys this unpleasant tasks, and of course, to relieve them from themselves.
Spitzer once described as "Sheriff of Wall Street, holds the future of the Democratic Party and even President Wood, now a dayglo Scarlet Letter. This public officials brilliant light is gone for good by most accounts ... but who knows. No attempt was made noted that the public has a short attentionSpanish
Spitzer has a little over a year was as governor of New York and was elected by the greatest voices of all the governor of New York (69%). He was extremely popular among the people, but had grown a long list of powerful enemies. He was not identified as dogooder zealous in its approach holds bared for the rehabilitation of Wall Street. He aggressively pursued Fortune 500 company and the mob. He even went after Dick Grasso, chairman of the New York Stock Exchange for the preservationOvercompensation. The number was around 140 million euros. Mmm ... could be exaggerated?
No matter what you take on Spitzer, we have on the origin and motivation of this research question. Spitzer comes from a wealthy family and his business would not normally attract IRS attention. However, it would not be a big leap to imagine him one of the Mount prostitution ring, perhaps, the political applications.
As the big fish, the whale took Spitzer to task with enormousSuccess. "Ten rules for companies to pay fines in the case: Bear Stearns, Credit Suisse First Boston, German Bank, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Salomon Smith Barney, UBS Warburg. These are the giants of Investment Banking. Who would dare to go toe to toe with the win with the guys? Spitzer.
He was editor of the Harvard Law Review, for a prestigious law firm to work right out of college, was an outstanding Attorney General andan effective governor. He also supported same-sex marriage licenses for illegal immigrants, and demonstrates the willingness to face difficult problems. By most accounts, he had an outstanding politician.
We can all debate Spitzer guilt or moral judgments, but one thing is clear. Not even the ringing of hands, gnashing of teeth, or hurling insults will not change a simple fact of life. The rich and powerful play by a different set of rules. This applies especiallyBorn into wealth. In their world everything can be bought, manipulated or fixed. Does it make sense that our leaders, who expect to become rich spoils in general and our loyal servant?
After the dust has placed, and we reduce this media saga, the cold facts. What we really have is a spoiled rich gifted child caught doing what the rich kids - having his cake (with extra icing) and eat it too. In a word, the son of a real estate tycoon, who has lived an interesting life since the day hewas born, was conducting business as usual.
Spitzer's fall is suggestive of the big, fat history that lives in the media. We have everything you bought the huge, low crime and punishment used, a destroyed family, different extramarital sex, authorities as a political weapon. There is already talk of a movie deal.
What can citizens expect from this 3-circus of a scandal to win? Will it serve as a deterrent for future leaders? Will it improve their moral character?Will the next election to install a capable civil servant? This is not likely.
What does all this achieve? We now have a very public humiliation of a privileged and politicians met ... and natural - the outing of Ms Dupre. Wall Street power brokers can graze on their worthy opponents are neutralized. But ultimately, this could ... Sound and fury signifies the realities of our imperfect political system? Once developed this soap opera, this episode is best noted asjust another generic "Tale of entitlement."
No comments:
Post a Comment